Table 5: Savings in the coke consumption in the sintering process as the result of replacing L.S. by C.M.
|
No. |
Calcareous mud (%) |
Saving in coke (%) |
Drum test (%) |
|
1 |
0 (100% L.S.) |
0 |
12.0 |
|
2 |
10 (90% L.S.) |
2 |
12.3 |
|
3 |
20 (80% L.S.) |
4 |
12.5 |
|
4 |
30 (70% L.S.) |
6 |
12.8 |
|
5 |
40 (60% L.S.) |
8 |
13.0 |
|
6 |
50 (50% L.S.) |
9 |
13.2 |
|
7 |
60 (40% L.S.) |
10 |
13.5 |
|
8 |
70 (30% L.S.) |
11 |
13.8 |
|
9 |
80 (20% L.S.) |
12 |
14.0 |
|
10 |
90 (10% L.S.) |
14 |
14.2 |
|
11 |
100 (0% L.S.) |
15 |
14.5 |